arctic mx-5 vs noctua nt-h2

we will be comparing the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 thermal compounds. Thermal compounds, also known as a thermal paste or thermal interface material, are used to improve the thermal conductivity between a CPU and its heatsink, helping to keep the CPU cool and stable. Both the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 are popular options among PC builders, but they have different features and price points, so it can be difficult to decide which one is the best choice for a particular build. In this post, we will compare the performance and other relevant factors of the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 to help you make an informed decision.

Comparing Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2

The Arctic MX-5 is a high-quality, professional-grade thermal compound that provides superior heat transfer and excellent thermal conductivity. It is composed of microscopic particles that ensure maximum contact with the CPU surface and offers low thermal resistance, even in high operating temperatures. Additionally, it has a temperature range of -40°C to 200°C, making it suitable for both overclocking and silent cooling.

The Noctua NT-H2 is another great option for those who want to get more out of their CPU. It features premium quality particles that provide excellent heat transfer as well as a low thermal resistance in a wide range of temperatures (0°C to 130°C). The compound also includes its own patented Thermal Conductive Technology (TCT) which ensures efficient cooling under extreme conditions such as overclocking or heavy gaming sessions.

In terms of performance, the Arctic MX-5 has been shown to reduce CPU temperatures by up to 10% compared to other standard thermal compounds. On top of that, its low viscosity allows for faster application and easy spreading over the CPU surface which results in improved cooling efficiency. The Noctua NT-H2 also delivers impressive results as it can reduce temperatures by up to 8%. Its TCT technology also helps enhance cooling performance while maintaining stable temperatures throughout usage.

When it comes to compatibility with different processors, both products are suitable for Intel LGA 1156/1155/1150/1151/2011 sockets as well as AMD Socket AM3/AM2+/AM2/FM2+/FM2 sockets. This means they can be used with most modern CPUs on the market today.

Overall, both the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 are excellent choices when it comes to finding a quality thermal compound for your processor. Each product provides reliable performance and good compatibility with different processors so you can be sure you’re getting value for money either way.

[su_note note_color=”#fcf8ea” text_color=”#000000″ radius=”7″]Read Also: Corsair 5000D with top mounted Arctic II 360 AIO. [/su_note]

Other factors to consider

In addition to performance, there are several other factors that may influence a user’s decision between the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 thermal compounds. These include:

• Compatibility: Both the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 are compatible with a wide range of CPUs and heatsinks, so you should be able to use either one with most hardware. However, it’s always a good idea to double-check the compatibility of the thermal compound with your specific hardware to ensure a good fit.
• Ease of application: Both the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 are known for being easy to apply and spread, thanks to their non-curing and non-electrical conductive properties. However, the Noctua NT-H2 may require more care in storage and handling, as it is a more premium product that is designed to last longer.
• Price: The Arctic MX-5 is generally more affordable than the Noctua NT-H2, which is a premium product that is known for its excellent performance and longevity. This may be an important factor for users who are working with a limited budget or who are looking for a more cost-effective solution.
• Other factors: There are many other factors that may influence a user’s decision between the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2, such as the specific needs and goals of the user, the ambient temperature and airflow in the system, and the specific application technique.

Overall, it is important to consider all of these factors when deciding between the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 thermal compounds, in order to choose the best option for your specific needs and goals.

pros and cons arctic mx-5 vs noctua nt-h2

Pros of the Arctic MX-5

• Affordable price: The Arctic MX-5 is generally more affordable than other thermal compounds on the market.
• Good thermal conductivity: The Arctic MX-5 has a thermal conductivity of 8.5 W/mK, which is a good, but not outstanding, value compared to other thermal compounds.
• Easy to apply: The Arctic MX-5 is known for being easy to apply and spread, thanks to its non-curing and non-electrical conductive properties.
• Wide compatibility: The Arctic MX-5 is compatible with a wide range of CPUs and heatsinks, making it a good choice for a variety of builds.

Cons of the Arctic MX-5

• Lower performance compared to premium options: The Arctic MX-5 may not offer the best possible performance compared to premium thermal compounds like the Noctua NT-H2.
• May not be as long-lasting as premium options: The Arctic MX-5 may not have the same level of longevity as premium thermal compounds like the Noctua NT-H2.

Pros of the Noctua NT-H2

• Excellent performance: The Noctua NT-H2 is known for its excellent performance and thermal conductivity.
• Long-lasting: The Noctua NT-H2 is known for its long-lasting performance, thanks to its high-quality ingredients and special storage and handling requirements.
• Wide compatibility: The Noctua NT-H2 is compatible with a wide range of CPUs and heatsinks, making it a good choice for a variety of builds.

Cons of the Noctua NT-H2

• Higher price: The Noctua NT-H2 is generally more expensive than other thermal compounds on the market, reflecting its premium status.
• May require more care in storage and handling: The Noctua NT-H2 may require more care in storage and handling compared to other thermal compounds, as it is a more premium product that is designed to last longer.

Final Verdict

the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 are both popular thermal compounds that are known for their good performance and ease of use. The Arctic MX-5 is a budget-friendly option that is known for its reliability and easy application, while the Noctua NT-H2 is a premium product that is known for its excellent performance and longevity.

Both thermal compounds have a good thermal conductivity of 8.5 W/mK and are compatible with a wide range of CPUs and heatsinks, making them a good choice for a variety of builds. However, the Noctua NT-H2 may offer better performance and be more long-lasting than the Arctic MX-5, although it is generally more expensive.

Ultimately, the best thermal compound for a particular system will depend on the specific needs and goals of the user. Some users may prioritize affordability and ease of use, while others may be willing to pay a premium for the best possible performance and longevity. Both the Arctic MX-5 and Noctua NT-H2 are good choices, and it may be worth considering both options to determine which one is the best fit for your specific needs.